Sleep deprivation among surgical residents: Does it affect performance while practising a laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis?

INTRODUCTION: To assess the impact of fatigue due to incorrect night rest in the performance of a laparoscopic manual anastomosis. METHODS: A prospective study evaluating the results from the realization of a manual endotrainer entero-enteral anastomosis performed by residents in terms of fatigue caused by inadequate nightly rest. Two groups were established; the FATIGUE group (F): anastomosis performed by residents coming off shift who slept less than seven hours and the REST group(R), being those who slept at home for more than 7 h. The time taken, length of the anastomosis and quality of such were compared based on 4 parameters: Air leak test, correct tension on the suture line, accurate opposition of the edges and optimal distance between stitches. RESULTS: 402 anastomoses were studied (211 rest group, 191 fatigue group). In the fatigue group leaks were detected in 33.5% anastomoses, as opposed to 19.4% in the rest group (P < .01). El rest group performed the anastomosis in 56.75 min and the fatigue group in 61,49 min (P = .006). There were no significant differences in the others parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue increases the risk of leakage and the time to do the exercise.

Fatiga por deprivación de sueño en residentes de cirugía: ¿Afecta a los resultados al realizar una anastomosis laparoscópica intestinal? / Sleep deprivation among surgical residents: does it affect performance while practising a laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis?

IntroducciónEvaluar el impacto de la fatiga por incorrecto descanso nocturno en la realización de una anastomosis manual laparoscópica.MétodosSe lleva a cabo un estudio prospectivo observacional evaluando la realización de una anastomosis manual enteroenteral en endotrainer por residentes. Se dividen en dos grupos; el grupo descanso incluye a residentes que han dormido en casa siete o más horas vs. al grupo fatiga formado por residentes de guardia o que han dormido menos de siete horas. Se evalúa el tiempo empleado, la longitud de la anastomosis, la correcta tensión de la línea de sutura, la correcta aposición de los bordes, la distancia entre puntos y la fuga de aire, en prueba neumática de estanqueidad.ResultadosSe evalúan 402 anastomosis, siendo 211 pertenecientes al grupo descanso y 191 al grupo fatiga. Se detecta fuga en el 33,5% de las anastomosis del grupo fatiga frente al 19,4% en el grupo descanso (p < 0,01). El tiempo empleado en el grupo descanso es de 56,75 vs. 61,49 min en el grupo fatiga (p = 0,006). No hay diferencias en el resto de los parámetros.DiscusiónLa fatiga aumenta el riesgo de fuga y el tiempo que se tarda en completar el ejercicio (AU)

IntroductionTo assess the impact of fatigue due to incorrect night rest in the performance of a laparoscopic manual anastomosis.MethodsA prospective study evaluating the results from the realization of a manual endotrainer entero-enteral anastomosis performed by residents in terms of fatigue caused by inadequate nightly rest. Two groups were established; the fatigue group (F): anastomosis performed by residents coming off shift who slept less than seven hours and the rest group (R), being those who slept at home for more than 7 hours. The time taken, length of the anastomosis and quality of such were compared based on 4 parameters: Air leak test, correct tension on the suture line, accurate opposition of the edges and optimal distance between stitches.Results402 anastomoses were studied (211 rest group, 191 fatigue group). In the fatigue group leaks were detected in 33,5% anastomoses, as opposed to 19,4% in the rest group (p < 0.01). El rest group performed the anastomosis in 56,75 min and the fatigue group in 61,49 min (p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in the others parameters (AU)

Análisis de los estilos de aprendizaje en un curso de habilidades técnicas laparoscópicas. Implicaciones para el entrenamiento quirúrgico / Analysis of learning styles in a laparoscopic technical skills course. Implications for surgical training

Introducción: El aprendizaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas es un proceso dinámico. David Kolb describió en los años ochenta un modelo de aprendizaje que permite adaptar el tipo de enseñanza y mejorar los resultados de esta. El objetivo del estudio es identificar los estilos de aprendizaje según Kolb de los participantes en un curso de habilidades técnicas laparoscópicas y comprobar si existe relación con el rendimiento final de la tarea realizada. Métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo que incluye 64 participantes que completaron un curso intensivo donde realizaron anastomosis intestinales manuales laparoscópicas. Todos ellos completaron el inventario de estilos de aprendizaje de Kolb. En cada anastomosis se recogió el tiempo de ejecución y se valoró su calidad. Posteriormente, los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente. Resultados: El estilo de aprendizaje más frecuente fue el asimilador (39,1%). No se observan diferencias significativas entre los estilos y el sexo de los participantes, su categoría profesional, el tiempo en realizar la anastomosis o su calidad. Conclusiones: El estilo de aprendizaje predominante es el asimilador, sin diferencias entre categorías, edad o sexo. No existe relación entre el estilo de aprendizaje de los participantes y los resultados obtenidos en el curso. (AU)

Introduction: Learning surgical techniques is a dynamic process. In the 1980s David Kolb described developed a learning model that enabled teaching styles to adapt for better learner outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the Kolb learning styles of the participants in a laparoscopic technical skills course and to check see if there was any relationship with performance. Methods: An observational descriptive study was conducted with 64 participants in an intensive course in which they performed laparoscopic manual intestinal anastomoses. All completed Kolb's inventory of learning styles. For each anastomosis, join quality was assessed and the performing time recorded. After that, they were analyzed through statistical studies. Results: The most frequent learning style was assimilating type (39.1%). No significant differences were observed between different learning styles and gender, professional category, the time taken or the quality of the anastomoses. Conclusions: Assimilating type was the most frequent Kolb learning style, with no differences observed between categories, age or gender. There is no relationship between the learning style of the participants and the results obtained in the course. (AU)

Analysis of learning styles in a laparoscopic technical skills course. Implications for surgical training.

INTRODUCTION: Learning surgical techniques is a dynamic process. In the 1980s David Kolb described developed a learning model that enabled teaching styles to adapt for better learner outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the Kolb learning styles of the participants in a laparoscopic technical skills course and to check see if there was any relationship with performance. METHODS: An observational descriptive study was conducted with 64 participants in an intensive course in which they performed laparoscopic manual intestinal anastomoses. All completed Kolb's inventory of learning styles. For each anastomosis, join quality was assessed and the performing time recorded. After that, they were analyzed through statistical studies. RESULTS: The most frequent learning style was assimilating type (39.1%). No significant differences were observed between different learning styles and gender, professional category, the time taken or the quality of the anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS: Assimilating type was the most frequent Kolb learning style, with no differences observed between categories, age or gender. There is no relationship between the learning style of the participants and the results obtained in the course.

Sleep deprivation among surgical residents: does it affect performance while practising a laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis? / Fatiga por deprivación de sueño en residentes de cirugía: ¿Afecta a los resultados al realizar una anastomosis laparoscópica intestinal?

INTRODUCTION: To assess the impact of fatigue due to incorrect night rest in the performance of a laparoscopic manual anastomosis. METHODS: A prospective study evaluating the results from the realization of a manual endotrainer entero-enteral anastomosis performed by residents in terms of fatigue caused by inadequate nightly rest. Two groups were established; the fatigue group (F): anastomosis performed by residents coming off shift who slept less than seven hours and the rest group (R), being those who slept at home for more than 7 hours. The time taken, length of the anastomosis and quality of such were compared based on 4 parameters: Air leak test, correct tension on the suture line, accurate opposition of the edges and optimal distance between stitches. RESULTS: 402 anastomoses were studied (211 rest group, 191 fatigue group). In the fatigue group leaks were detected in 33,5% anastomoses, as opposed to 19,4% in the rest group (p < 0.01). El rest group performed the anastomosis in 56,75 min and the fatigue group in 61,49 min (p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in the others parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue increases the risk of leakage and the time to do the exercise.

Analysis of learning styles in a laparoscopic technical skills course. Implications for surgical training. / Análisis de los estilos de aprendizaje en un curso de habilidades técnicas laparoscópicas. Implicaciones para el entrenamiento quirúrgico.

INTRODUCTION: Learning surgical techniques is a dynamic process. In the 1980s David Kolb described developed a learning model that enabled teaching styles to adapt for better learner outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the Kolb learning styles of the participants in a laparoscopic technical skills course and to check see if there was any relationship with performance. METHODS: An observational descriptive study was conducted with 64 participants in an intensive course in which they performed laparoscopic manual intestinal anastomoses. All completed Kolb's inventory of learning styles. For each anastomosis, join quality was assessed and the performing time recorded. After that, they were analyzed through statistical studies. RESULTS: The most frequent learning style was assimilating type (39.1%). No significant differences were observed between different learning styles and gender, professional category, the time taken or the quality of the anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS: Assimilating type was the most frequent Kolb learning style, with no differences observed between categories, age or gender. There is no relationship between the learning style of the participants and the results obtained in the course.

Desarrollo y validación de una herramienta para la evaluación de la anastomosis intestinal laparoscópica en simulación / Development and Validation of a Tool for the Evaluation of Laparoscopic Intestinal Anastomosis in Simulation

INTRODUCCIÓN: La anastomosis intestinal laterolateral laparoscópica es una práctica habitual en la clínica y entrenada en simulación. El objetivo del estudio es el diseño y posterior validación de una herramienta fiable y reproducible para su evaluación. MÉTODOS: Se utilizó un método Delphi modificado para desarrollar los elementos de evaluación al que finalmente incluyeron 5 apartados (separación entre puntos, eversión, tensión, estanqueidad y iatrogenia). Se incluyeron 21 participantes, 10 residentes quirúrgicos de primer año y 11 expertos. Realizaron anastomosis enteroentéricas laterolateral laparoscópica en víscera ex-vivo porcina de 5 cm. Las evaluaciones fueron ciegas y realizadas por 2 evaluadores de forma independiente. RESULTADOS: Las medias obtenidas por noveles y expertos fueron respectivamente: separación entre puntos 3,2 vs.5,7 (p < 0,001), eversión 3,3 vs.5,9 (p = 0,004), tensión 2,9 vs.5,9 (p = 0,001), estanqueidad 3,2 vs.5,7 (p = 0,005), iatrogenia 6,9 vs.7 (p = 0,47). El parámetro iatrogenia no es discriminatorio, por lo que fue eliminado de la herramienta. Los resultados totales fueron 12,5 los noveles y 23,2 los expertos (p = 0,001). La correlación entre observadores presenta un coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,99 para la separación entre puntos, 0,94 la eversión, 0,98 la tensión y 0,99 la estanqueidad. La relación entre la puntuación y la fuga anastomótica sin presión: presenta una R de Rosenthal de -0,71 (p < 0,001); con presión se obtiene una R = 0,55 (p = 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: La herramienta diseñada es válida para discriminar entre participantes noveles y expertos, presenta muy alta concordancia entre observadores y se correlaciona con el riesgo de fuga

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic side-to-side intestinal anastomosis is a common in clinic practice and training simulation. The aim of this study is to design and validate a reliable and reproducible tool for its evaluation. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to design a tool with elements that determine quality, including 5 items: separation between stiches, eversion, tension, leak and iatrogenesis. The study included 21 participants (10 first-year residents and 11 experts) who performed a 5 cm laparoscopic intestinal side-to-side anastomosis with porcine viscera. The evaluations were blinded and done independently by 2 evaluators. RESULTS: The means obtained by novice and expert participants were, respectively: separation between stiches 3.2 vs.5.7 (P < .001), eversion 3.3 vs.5.9 (P = .004), tension 2.9 vs.5.9 (P = .001), leak tightness 3.2 vs.5.7 (P = .005), iatrogenesis 6.9 vs.7 (P = .47). The iatrogenesis parameter was not discriminatory, so it was removed from the tool. The total results were 12.5 for novices and 23.2 for experts (P = .001). The correlation between observers presented an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 for the separation between stiches, 0.94 for eversion, 0.98 for tension and 0.99 for leak. The correlation between the score and the leak without pressure presented a Rosenthal's R of -0.71 (P < .001); with pressure R = -0.55 (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The designed tool is valid to discriminate between novice and expert participants, presents very high concordance between observers and correlates with the risk of leak

Development and Validation of a Tool for the Evaluation of Laparoscopic Intestinal Anastomosis in Simulation. / Desarrollo y validación de una herramienta para la evaluación de la anastomosis intestinal laparoscópica en simulación.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic side-to-side intestinal anastomosis is a common in clinic practice and training simulation. The aim of this study is to design and validate a reliable and reproducible tool for its evaluation. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to design a tool with elements that determine quality, including 5 items: separation between stiches, eversion, tension, leak and iatrogenesis. The study included 21 participants (10 first-year residents and 11 experts) who performed a 5cm laparoscopic intestinal side-to-side anastomosis with porcine viscera. The evaluations were blinded and done independently by 2 evaluators. RESULTS: The means obtained by novice and expert participants were, respectively: separation between stiches 3.2 vs. 5.7 (P < .001), eversion 3.3 vs. 5.9 (P = .004), tension 2.9 vs. 5.9 (P = .001), leak tightness 3.2 vs. 5.7 (P = .005), iatrogenesis 6.9 vs. 7 (P = .47). The iatrogenesis parameter was not discriminatory, so it was removed from the tool. The total results were 12.5 for novices and 23.2 for experts (P = .001). The correlation between observers presented an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 for the separation between stiches, 0.94 for eversion, 0.98 for tension and 0.99 for leak. The correlation between the score and the leak without pressure presented a Rosenthal's R of -0.71 (P < .001); with pressure R = -0.55 (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The designed tool is valid to discriminate between novice and expert participants, presents very high concordance between observers and correlates with the risk of leak.

La simulación como modelo de enseñanza en cirugía / Simulation as a surgical teaching model

La enseñanza de la cirugía se ha visto afectada por múltiples factores a lo largo de estos últimos años, como son la reducción de la jornada laboral, la optimización del uso del quirófano o la seguridad del paciente. La metodología de enseñanza tradicional no logra minimizar el impacto de estos factores en la formación de los cirujanos. La simulación como modelo de enseñanza minimiza dicho impacto y es más eficaz que los métodos docentes tradicionales para integrar los conocimientos y las habilidades clínico-quirúrgicas complejas. La simulación complementa la asistencia clínica al paciente con la formación, creando un entorno de aprendizaje seguro en el que no se ve afectada la seguridad del paciente ni se generan conflictos éticos ni legales. Las metodologías de aprendizaje que utilizan la simulación permiten individualizar la enseñanza adaptándola a las necesidades de aprendizaje de cada alumno. Además, permiten entrenar todo tipo de habilidades técnicas, cognitivas o de comportamiento (AU)

Teaching of surgery has been affected by many factors over the last years, such as the reduction of working hours, the optimization of the use of the operating room or patient safety. Traditional teaching methodology fails to reduce the impact of these factors on surgeons training. Simulation as a teaching model minimizes such impact, and is more effective than traditional teaching methods for integrating knowledge and clinical-surgical skills. Simulation complements clinical assistance with training, creating a safe learning environment where patient safety is not affected, and ethical or legal conflicts are avoided. Simulation uses learning methodologies that allow teaching individualization, adapting it to the learning needs of each student. It also allows training of all kinds of technical, cognitive or behavioural skills (AU)

Simulation as a surgical teaching model. / La simulación como modelo de enseñanza en cirugía.

Teaching of surgery has been affected by many factors over the last years, such as the reduction of working hours, the optimization of the use of the operating room or patient safety. Traditional teaching methodology fails to reduce the impact of these factors on surgeons training. Simulation as a teaching model minimizes such impact, and is more effective than traditional teaching methods for integrating knowledge and clinical-surgical skills. Simulation complements clinical assistance with training, creating a safe learning environment where patient safety is not affected, and ethical or legal conflicts are avoided. Simulation uses learning methodologies that allow teaching individualization, adapting it to the learning needs of each student. It also allows training of all kinds of technical, cognitive or behavioural skills.

Learning curve patterns generated by a training method for laparoscopic small bowel anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: The identification of developmental curve patterns generated by a simulation-based educational method and the variables that can accelerate the learning process will result in cost-effective training. This study describes the learning curves of a simulation-based instructional design (ID) that uses ex vivo animal models to teach laparoscopic latero-lateral small bowel anastomosis. METHODS: Twenty general surgery residents were evaluated on their performance of laparoscopic latero-lateral jejuno-jejunal anastomoses (JJA) and gastro-jejunal anastomoses (GJA), using swine small bowel and stomach on an endotrainer. The ID included the following steps: (1) provision of references and videos demonstrating the surgical technique, (2) creation of an engaging context for learning, (3) critical review of the literature and video on the procedures, (4) demonstration of the critical steps, (5) hands-on practice, (6) in-action instructor's feedback, (7) quality assessment, (8) debriefing at the end of the session, and (9) deliberate and repetitive practice. Time was recorded from the beginning to the completion of the procedure, along with the presence or absence of anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: The participants needed to perform 23.8 ± 6.96 GJA (12-35) and 24.2 ± 6.96 JJA (9-43) to attain proficiency. The starting point of the learning curve was higher for the GJA than for the JJA, although the slope and plateau were parallel. Further, four types of learning curves were identified: (1) exponential, (2) rapid, (3) slow, and (4) no tendency. The type of pattern could be predicted after procedure number 8. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help to identify the learning curve of a trainee early in the developmental process, estimate the number of sessions required to reach a performance goal, determine a trainee's readiness to practice the procedure on patients, and identify the subjects who lack the innate technical abilities. It may help motivated individuals to become reflective and self-regulated learners. Moreover, the standardization of the ID may help to measure the effectiveness of learning strategies and make comparisons with other educational strategies.

Resultados iniciales de la esofaguectomía robótica en el cáncer de esófago / Initial results of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

INTRODUCCIÓN: La experiencia con la esofaguectomía robótica en el cáncer de esófago y de la unión esofagogástrica es limitada. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar nuestra experiencia actual. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo, de vigilancia observacional, de las primeras 32 esofaguectomías mínimamente invasivas por cáncer con toracoscopia robótica entre septiembre de 2011 y junio de 2014. La plastia gástrica se realizó por vía laparoscópica. La toracoscopia robótica se llevó a cabo con el paciente en decúbito prono y la anastomosis intratorácica, siempre de forma manual. Se evaluaron las siguientes variables: características clínicas y patológicas, técnica quirúrgica, resultados a corto plazo (morbimortalidad) y resultados oncológicos (radicalidad y ganglios extirpados). RESULTADOS: A 32 pacientes con una edad media de 58 años (rango 34-74) se les realizó una esofaguectomía mínimamente invasiva en su totalidad: laparoscopia y toracoscopia robótica (11 McKeown y 21 Ivor Lewis). En 29 casos se administró quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. No hubo conversiones a cirugía abierta. El tiempo medio de consola fue 218 min (rango 190-285) y la pérdida de sangre fue de 170 ml (rango 40-255). Un paciente falleció por causa cardiológica y 9 presentaron complicaciones mayores (grado II o más de Dindo-Clavien). No hubo complicaciones respiratorias ni parálisis recurrencial. Hubo 5 fístulas intratorácicas, 4 radiológicas y una clínica, 3 quilotórax, 2 fístulas cervicales y una necrosis de la plastia. La mediana de la estancia hospitalaria fue 12 días (rango 8-50). Todas las resecciones fueron R0 y se extirparon una mediana de 16 (rango 2-23) ganglios linfáticos. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados indican inicialmente que la esofaguectomía mínimamente invasiva con toracoscopia robótica es segura y respeta los principios oncológicos

INTRODUCTION: There is scant experience with robot-assisted esophagectomy in cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Our aim is to report our current experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational cohort study of the first 32 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from September 2011 to June 2014. The gastric tube was created laparoscopically. In the thoracic field, a robot-assisted thoracoscopic approach was performed in the prone position with intrathoracic robotic hand-sewn anastomosis. Patient and tumour characteristics, surgical technique, short-term outcomes (morbidity and mortality) and oncological results (radicality and number of removed nodes) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, with a mean age of 58 years (34-74) were treated by a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy: robotic laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (11 McKeown and 21 Ivor-Lewis). Twenty-nine received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. There were no conversions to open surgery. Console time was 218 minutes (190-285). Blood loss was 170 ml (40-255). One patient died from cardiac disease. Nine patients had a major complication (Dindo-Clavien grade II or higher). There was no case of respiratory complication or recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Five patients had intrathoracic fistula, 4 radiological and one clinical. Three had chylothorax, 2 cervical fistula and one gastric tube necrosis. The median hospital stay was 12 days (8-50). All the resections were R0 and the median of removed lymph nodes was 16 (2-23). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that minimally invasive esophagectomy with robot-assisted thoracoscopy is safe and achieves oncological standards

[Initial results of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer]. / Resultados iniciales de la esofaguectomía robótica en el cáncer de esófago.

INTRODUCTION: There is scant experience with robot-assisted esophagectomy in cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Our aim is to report our current experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational cohort study of the first 32 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from September 2011 to June 2014. The gastric tube was created laparoscopically. In the thoracic field, a robot-assisted thoracoscopic approach was performed in the prone position with intrathoracic robotic hand-sewn anastomosis. Patient and tumour characteristics, surgical technique, short-term outcomes (morbidity and mortality) and oncological results (radicality and number of removed nodes) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, with a mean age of 58 years (34-74) were treated by a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy: robotic laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (11 McKeown and 21 Ivor-Lewis). Twenty-nine received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. There were no conversions to open surgery. Console time was 218minutes (190-285). Blood loss was 170ml (40-255). One patient died from cardiac disease. Nine patients had a major complication (Dindo-Clavien grade II or higher). There was no case of respiratory complication or recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Five patients had intrathoracic fistula, 4 radiological and one clinical. Three had chylothorax, 2 cervical fistula and one gastric tube necrosis. The median hospital stay was 12 days (8-50). All the resections were R0 and the median of removed lymph nodes was 16 (2-23). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that minimally invasive esophagectomy with robot-assisted thoracoscopy is safe and achieves oncological standards.

Cirugía endoscópica transanal en tumores rectales / Transanal endoscopic operations for rectal tumours

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía endoscópica transanal puede ser la técnica de elección para el tratamiento de las lesiones rectales, tanto benignas como malignas seleccionadas, con cifras de supervivencia equiparables a la cirugía convencional y tasas de morbilidad más bajas. MÉTODOS: Presentamos una serie de 70 pacientes intervenidos por operación endoscópica transanal (TEO); las indicaciones fueron lesiones rectales benignas o malignas en estadio precoz (T1) 86%. La cirugía se instrumentó con un sistema TEO (Karl Storz, Tüttlingen, Alemania) y bisturí armónico (Harmonic scalpel, Ethicon Endo-Surgery). RESULTADOS: En 43 pacientes la indicación fue lesión adenomatosa; en los 27 restantes el diagnóstico preoperatorio fue de adenocarcinoma. Sin embargo, tras la resección, 47% mostraron lesión maligna en el resultado anatomopatológico, incluyendo 13 de los 43 considerados inicialmente como benignos. La morbilidad postoperatoria global fue del 36%, Clavien III (5,7%), precisando reintervención inmediata 3 (4%). Todas las lesiones benignas se resecaron de forma completa y 7 malignas presentaron afectación del margen de resección. Con un seguimiento medio de 26,4 meses (1-71), la recidiva para tumores benignos ha sido del 9% para pT1 del 8% y, para pT2, del 12,5%. Precisaron nueva cirugía 8 pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: La TEO permite extirpar tumores benignos de recto no resecables mediante resección endoscópica o transanal con un bajo índice de morbilidad. También está indicada en el tratamiento curativo de las neoplasias malignas de recto que se confirman histológicamente como carcinomas pT1 de buen pronóstico

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) may be the technique of choice for the treatment of rectal lesions, both benign and selected malignant lesions, with similar survival rates to conventional surgery but with lower morbidity. METHODS: In this article we present a series of 70 patients operated on with this procedure (TEO) in our center. The indications were benign rectal lesions and malignant lesions at early stages (T1) 86%. The surgical procedure was performed with the the transanal endoscopic operation platform (TEO; Karl Storz, Tüttlingen, Germany) and ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic scalpel, Ethicon Endo-surgery,...).RESULTS: The indication in 43 patients was a benign lesion (adenoma), in the other 27 the diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. After the resection, 61% of the series had a malignant lesion in the pathology report: 13 patients of the 43 with a benign lesion initially had a malignant lesion in the pathology report. Postoperative morbidity was 36%, Clavien III (5,7%). 3 patients (4%) needed emergency surgery. All of the benign lesions were completely excised, but 7 malignant lesions had resection margin involvement The median follow-up time was 26,4 months (range, 1-71 months), the overall recurrence for benign tumors was 9%, 8% for malignant pT1 and 12,5% for malignant pT2. Early salvage surgery was performed on 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: TEO allows us to excise benign rectal lesions that could not be excised with a conventional approach (endoscopic or transanal resection) with a low morbidity rate. TEO can be used for malignant rectal tumors in early stages (pT1) with pathological confirmation

[Transanal endoscopic operations for rectal tumours]. / Cirugía endoscópica transanal en tumores rectales.

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) may be the technique of choice for the treatment of rectal lesions, both benign and selected malignant lesions, with similar survival rates to conventional surgery but with lower morbidity. METHODS: In this article we present a series of 70 patients operated on with this procedure (TEO) in our center. The indications were benign rectal lesions and malignant lesions at early stages (T1) 86%. The surgical procedure was performed with the the transanal endoscopic operation platform (TEO; Karl Storz, Tüttlingen, Germany) and ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic scalpel, Ethicon Endo-surgery,…). RESULTS: The indication in 43 patients was a benign lesion (adenoma), in the other 27 the diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. After the resection, 61% of the series had a malignant lesion in the pathology report: 13 patients of the 43 with a benign lesion initially had a malignant lesion in the pathology report. Postoperative morbidity was 36%, Clavien III (5,7%). 3 patients (4%) needed emergency surgery. All of the benign lesions were completely excised, but 7 malignant lesions had resection margin involvement The median follow-up time was 26,4 months (range, 1-71 months), the overall recurrence for benign tumors was 9%, 8% for malignant pT1 and 12,5% for malignant pT2. Early salvage surgery was performed on 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: TEO allows us to excise benign rectal lesions that could not be excised with a conventional approach (endoscopic or transanal resection) with a low morbidity rate. TEO can be used for malignant rectal tumors in early stages (pT1) with pathological confirmation.